Overview
The Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts (ELA) and Literacy are rigorous, internationally benchmarked, and aligned with college and work expectations. They also differ in many respects from the ELA/reading standards that many states currently use. Most notably, they set requirements not only for English language arts but also for literacy across the content areas in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects.
The literacy standards in the content areas are intended complement the content standards, not supplant them. The K-5 standards are cross-disciplinary; grades 6-12 for ELA and for literacy in the content areas foster the idea of a shared responsibility for literacy development.
In addition, the instructional shifts of the Common Core set high expectations for teachers if they are to be truly aligned with the standards in terms of curricular materials and classroom instruction. EngageNY, a collaborative platform for teachers in New York, discusses the six shifts , which require teachers to:
- Expect active participation of all students
- Facilitate the learning process rather than disseminate the information
- Make their content literacy expertise visible to all
- Create carefully structured situations that allow students to solve problems independently
- Encourage students to draw on their abilities to discover answers by themselves rather than rely on adults to supply the facts
To understand what these changes will look like in the classroom, let’s take a closer look at the shifts and what they mean for both teachers and students.
What are the shifts?
Shift 1: Balancing Informational & Literary Texts (K-5)
Students read a true balance of informational and literary texts. Elementary school classrooms are, therefore, places where students access the world — science, social studies, the arts and literature — through text. At least 50% of what students read is informational.
What the Student Does … | What the Teacher Does … |
---|---|
Build content knowledge | Balance informational & literary text |
Exposure to the world through reading | Scaffold for informational texts |
Apply strategies | Teach “through” and “with” informational texts |
Shift 2: Knowledge in the Disciplines (Grades 6-12)
Content area teachers outside of the ELA classroom emphasize literacy experiences in their planning and instruction. Students learn through domain specific texts in science and social studies classrooms — rather than referring to the text, they are expected to learn from what they read.
What the Student Does … | What the Teacher Does … |
---|---|
Build content knowledge through text | Shift identity: “I teach reading.” |
Handle primary source documents | Stop referring and summarizing and start reading |
Find evidence | Slow down the history and science classroom |
Shift 3: Staircase of Complexity
In order to prepare students for the complexity of college and career ready texts, each grade level requires a “step” of growth on the “staircase”. Students read the central, grade appropriate text around which instruction is centered. Teachers are patient, create more time and space in the curriculum for this close and careful reading, and provide appropriate and necessary scaffolding and supports so that it is possible for students reading below grade level.
What the Student Does … | What the Teacher Does … |
---|---|
Re-read texts | Teach more complex texts at every grade level |
Read material at own level to enjoy reading | Give students less to read in order to further in depth |
Tolerate frustration with text | Spend more time on more complex texts |
Provide scaffolding & strategies to students | |
Engage with texts with other adults |
Shift 4: Text-based Answers
Students have rich and rigorous conversations which are dependent on a common text. Teachers insist that classroom experiences stay deeply connected to the text on the page and that students develop habits for making evidentiary arguments both in conversation, as well as in writing to assess comprehension of a text.
What the Student Does … | What the Teacher Does … |
---|---|
Find evidence to support their argument | Facilitate evidence-based conversations about text |
Form own judgments and become scholars | Plan and conduct rich conversations |
Conducting close reading of the text | Keep students in the text |
Engage with the author and his/her choices | Identify questions that are text-dependent, worthwhile, and stimulate discussion |
Spend much more time preparing for instruction by reading deeply. |
Shift 5: Writing from Sources
Writing needs to emphasize use of evidence to inform or make an argument rather than the personal narrative and other forms of decontextualized prompts. While the narrative still has an important role, students develop skills through written arguments that respond to the ideas, events, facts, and arguments presented in the texts they read.
What the Student Does … | What the Teacher Does … |
---|---|
Generate informational texts | Spend less time on personal narratives |
Make arguments using evidence | Present opportunities to write from multiple sources |
Organize for persuasion | Provide opportunities to analyze and synthesize ideas |
Compare multiple sources | Develop students’ voice so that they can argue a point with evidence |
Give permission to reach and articulate their own conclusions about what they read |
Shift 6: Academic Vocabulary
Students constantly build the vocabulary they need to access grade level complex texts. By focusing strategically on comprehension of pivotal and commonly found words (such as “discourse,” “generation,” “theory,” and “principled”) and less on esoteric literary terms (such as “onomatopoeia” or “homonym”), teachers constantly build students’ ability to access more complex texts across the content areas.
What the Student Does … | What the Teacher Does … |
---|---|
Use high octane words across content areas | Develop students’ ability to use and access words |
Build “language of power” database | Be strategic about the new vocabulary words |
Work with words students will use frequently | |
Teach fewer words more deeply |
Key Shifts and ELLs
What does this mean for English language learners?
The shifts have important implications for ELLs. Most importantly, ELLs need to be involved in the learning and taking part in a way that allows them to experience hands-on, student-centered learning. By having ELLs simply watch the other students interact, they are relegated to a position that will not maximize their time spent in the classroom.
That works hand-in-hand with the second expectation for planning classroom instruction, which is that ELLs need to be fully engaged in the learning process. Students learn best by doing. Working in cooperative groups or peer tutoring are two ways that involve students in the learning process.
It’s also critical to remember, however, that while learning in collaborative groups is beneficial, an opportunity to be accountable for one’s own learning is also needed for ELLs. In order to challenge students, teachers need to carefully craft a supportive environment and design ways that allow students to take risks, grapple with real-life situations, and problem solve as they will be expected to do whether at college or on the job. (For more on helping ELLs become more independent learners, see our video interview with Dr. Diane August.)
In addition, the Standards establish a shared responsibility for literacy development across the disciplines, not just for the ELA teacher. Teachers of ELA, history/social studies, science, and technical subjects are expected to “use their content area expertise to help students meet the particular challenges of reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language in their respective fields.” This means that content and literacy are taught simultaneously, providing ELLs with the opportunity to strengthen their literacy skills as they acquire content knowledge.
Finally, these shifts remind us that students have learned at a young age that most questions asked in school have only one correct answer. And the keeper of that answer has been the teacher. We know that students have greater retention of information when they have the opportunity to discover the answer themselves versus simply being told the answer. The process leading to the answer enhances the comprehension of concepts, which is why doing an experiment is far more powerful that watching someone else do it.
Final thoughts
It is clear that helping ELLs (and their English-speaking peers) adjust to these shifts will provide new challenges for educators and for the students themselves. Teachers, paraprofessional aides, and administrators will have to be creative in finding the most effective way to deliver engaging instruction and professional development. By better understanding what the shifts mean and how the mastery of this new approach will benefit our students, however, we can take the first important steps to helping our students succeed with the Common Core State Standards.
About the author
Susan Lafond, a Nationally Board Certified Teacher in English as a New Language (EAYA ENL), has 20 years of combined experience teaching ESL and foreign language. She currently works as a professional development assistant for educators with New York State United Teachers (NYSUT). Susan was appointed to the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) English as a New Language Standards Committee in February 2009 to review and revise the existing English as a New Language Standards and most recently participated as a member of the ELA Work Team for the Common Core State Standards Initiative.